Nietzche vs matthew essay

The low, the "bad," is an afterthought and is noticed only as a contrast that brings out more strongly the superiority of the noble ones. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Coursework work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

Essay UK - http: The Nature of Good Plato and Nietzsche have opposing views on the nature of good. The same intensity that creates a burning hatred in the priestly caste is also the one thing that Nietzsche claims makes humans "interesting.

This claim will have to be refined in the commentary on the following section, as we shall see Nietzsche come down very harshly against the ressentiment of slave morality, but it should be sufficient for the present discussion.

Its crowning achievement was the development of Christianity: Nietzsche is disappointed with their lack of a historical sense because they are unable to rise above the moral biases of their time: It looks outward and says "No" to the antagonistic external forces that oppose and oppress it.

Because contemporary English moral philosophy was dominated by utilitarianism, these psychologists interpreted the entire history of morality in terms of utility: They dub their masters "evil" and call themselves "good" by contrast.

Nietzsche outlines these two systems of morality in "Good and Evil Reconsidered. This lack of perspective can be problematic when doing history, but when trying to decipher the history of morals itself it can be disastrous. However, Nietzsche believes in the relative nature of good.

First Essay, Sections Summary Nietzsche suggests that the "slave revolt in morality" begins when ressentiment, or resentment, becomes a creative force.

Nietzsche notes that almost all the ancient Greek words denoting the lower orders of society are related to variants on the word for "unhappy. And just as the noble man develops the concept of "bad" almost as an afterthought, so is the concept of "good" created as an afterthought by the man of ressentiment to denote himself.

As strongly as the noble man believes inspiring fear is good, the slave ,just as strongly, believes it to be evil. For the most part, Nietzsche seems to be exhibiting a great deal of preference for master morality, but it seems he would also argue that these masters are not "interesting.

These are all undesirable qualities, and so the masters dub them as "bad. In the "Apology" he states that " With the advent and success of Christianity, Nietzsche suggests, the reversal of the moral code became complete: Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question.

By contrast, the man of ressentiment distorts what he sees so as to present the noble man in as bad a light as possible, and thereby to gain reassurance. These people are the poor, the unhealthy, the weak, and the impotent, and they learn to hate and resent the power and health of the masters.

This constant brooding and obsession with ones enemies begets the greatest invention of ressentiment: Christian love, created by this burning hatred. Careless readings of Nietzsche have also led to his being understood as an anti-Semite or a Nazi who encourages the Aryan "master" races to do away with Jewish slave morality.

Nietzsche remarks on how different the concepts of "evil" and "bad" are, in spite of both being considered the opposite of "good. Plato vs nietzche the nature of good Plato Vs. In allowing resentment and hatred to grow in him, in having to rely on patience, secrets, and scheming, the man of ressentiment ultimately becomes cleverer than the noble man.

Those opposed to the masters develop slave morality. This means that he is of the opinion that there is one perfect version of Good for all people, whether they are rich or poor, powerful or weak.

Nietzsche characterizes the nihilism he detests in contemporary society as a weariness with humanity. Nietzsche sees Jesus as the ultimate embodiment of these Jewish ideals, and his crucifixion as the ultimate bait.

The overthrow of master morality in favor of slave morality is nothing to be proud of. We no longer fear humanity, but we also no longer have hopes for, reverence of, or affirmation of humanity.

In the slave morality, "fellow feeling, the obliging helping hand, the warm heart, patience, industry, humility, and friendliness Obviously Nietzsche believes in the relative nature of good. With Nietzsche, the matter is rarely as simple as "this is good and this is bad": The concept of the "evil enemy" is basic to ressentiment just as "good" is basic to the noble man.Gospel of Matthew Essay example Words | 6 Pages The Teachings of Matthew The Gospel according to Matthew is the first book in the New Testament, and also serves as a bridge between the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Nietzsche's critique of Plato and Christianity Essay; Nietzsche's critique of Plato and Christianity Essay. Words Sep 23rd, 10 Pages. Show More. Essay No. 1: Write an essay on one of the thinkers covered in the unit so far (i.e. weeks ). Plato vs.

Nietzsche Essay. We will write a custom essay sample on Mark vs. Matthew: Comparing the Two Synoptic Gospels specifically for you for only $ $/page. Nietzsche’s critique of past philosophers Nietzsche identifies his two major grounds for criticizing past philosophers in his Preface: that their theories are founded on ‘some play on words perhaps, some seductive.

We will write a custom essay sample on Nietzche’s Master and Slave Morality specifically for you for only $ $/page.

Free Coursework

Before we move on to the second section of this essay, it is worth making a brief introductory distinction of the immediate sources of quarrel between our ' 5' POL' Research'Essay' ' ' thinkers: deontology, otherwise known as duty-based morality, and Nietzsche’s genealogy, a polemic of morality.

Nietzche vs matthew essay
Rated 3/5 based on 15 review